The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law
The Ultimate Guide To variation of maintenance order case law
Blog Article
Just a few years ago, searching for case precedent was a tough and time consuming job, necessitating persons to search through print copies of case legislation, or to pay for access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case legislation search opportunities, and a lot of sources offer free access to case law.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, It is additionally a well-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
limitation of liability on the extent of the cap provided because of the registered mortgage deed(Banking Law)
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
Preceding four tax years interpreted. It is not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
In this blog post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, exploring its provisions plus the gravity of its punishment.
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for that loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment about check here the offender, ensuring These are held accountable for their actions.
The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge as it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders holding in view that among the list of respondents has retired from service as pointed out with the counsel for your respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order regarding costs. Read more
The law as recognized in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may possibly request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Hence, it had been held that the right to some healthy environment was part of your fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and 14 from the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all sides of human existence, all these kinds of amenities and facilities that a person is entitled to delight in with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its opportunity to secure financial interests and maintain the integrity of the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, a comprehensive grasp of those changes is vital for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a robust legal system.
It also addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and one hundred twenty from the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to look at that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are totally different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case legislation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--